\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\pagestyle{empty}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage{multicol}
\usepackage[left=1.8cm,top=4cm,bottom=2cm,right=1.8cm,nohead,nofoot]{geometry}
\usepackage{sectsty}
\usepackage{relsize}
\allsectionsfont{\sffamily\raggedright}
\begin{document}
\begin{figure}[t]
\hspace{0.2cm}
\begin{minipage}[t]{.55\textwidth}
\flushleft
\Huge\textbf{Haskell Weekly News}
\end{minipage}
\hfill
\raisebox{0.4cm}{
\begin{minipage}[t]{.40\textwidth}
\flushright
Issue 66, October 25, 2007\\
\url{http://sequence.complete.org/}
\end{minipage}
}
\hspace{0.5cm}
\hrule
\vspace{0.5cm}
\end{figure}
\setlength{\columnsep}{0.5cm}
\setlength{\multicolsep}{1cm}
\begin{multicols}{2}
\setcounter{unbalance}{3}
\raggedcolumns
\bigskip
\hrule
\section*{Jobs}
\section*{Finance}
An NYC finance company requires an expert level Haskell user; must be comfortable with monads, monad transformers, type level programming (i.e. MPTC, overlapping and undecidable instances), and lazy evaluation (i.e. know how to find and eliminate space leaks).
\section*{Web Developer}
RedNucleus Ltd requires a highly motivated programmer for a full or part-time posititon developing social web applications. Initially you will develop and maintain applications using RubyOnRails or a similar framework, but there will be opportunities to explore new web programming paradigms with declarative languages. The successful application will have exposure to functional programming methodologies, e.g. in Haskell, Lisp or Erlang
\bigskip
\hrule
\section*{Quotes}
\begin{itemize}
\item \emph{} As someone who has written production code in functional languages (Ive written Haskell for the U.S. Navy) and in other languages (Perl and Ruby for several startups), I have to say that Haskell enabled me to be way more productive than the untyped scripting languages. Ruby is fun, but Haskell lets me get the work done faster and better.
\item \emph{} Perhaps if C wants to be taken seriously it should provide portability, which has been present in Haskell since the beginning
\item \emph{} However, since starting learning Haskell I?ve had aha-moments that manifest themselves in a single line of code. This has never happened before. Ever!
\item \emph{Cale} Inheritance? Inheritance is broken, anyway
\item \emph{DRMacIver} I dread to think what category theory would look like after the software engineering world had got their grubby paws on it. Enterprise variant functors. Commutative UML diagrams.
\item \emph{DukeDave} Haskell has the greatest unlearning curve
\item \emph{Jon Harrop} As Haskell has shown, laziness cannot be implemented efficient at all.
\item \emph{Logan Capaldo} All I want for christmas is monad comprehensions
\item \emph{Olathe} We can't be totally sure, though. There might be some value of 1 that wasn't checked.
\item \emph{Pseudonym} Smart programmers naturally write monadic code, even if they don't realise it.
\item \emph{augustss} Haskell already has enterprise monads; there is a fail method.
\item \emph{bitwize} The combinator known as compose; Makes me extremely morose; The full stop is better, than writing in letters; Which makes it extremely verbose
\item \emph{glguy} map became not overloaded in the great polymorphic scare of haskell 98
\item \emph{mauke} haskell software should move from alpha to beta to eta, then lambda
\item \emph{pl0nk} I wonder what SPJ sees when he closes his eyes before answering a question.
\end{itemize}
\end{multicols}
\vspace*{\fill}
\hrule
\hspace{0.5cm}
\flushleft
\begin{minipage}[t]{\textwidth}
\flushleft
\textbf{Choose higher order, polymorphic and purely functional. Choose Haskell.} \\
\url{http://haskell.org/} \\
\end{minipage}
\end{document}